Expert in focus: Robin Cote on the realities of pharmaceutical labeling sustainability

 

Robin’s path to pharmaceutical labeling was anything but conventional. 

With a background in wind energy, he joined Avery Dennison through the European Graduate Program, moving across pharma business development, premium label marketing and film product management before stepping into his current role as Product Manager, Pharmaceutical. That varied path turned out to be ideal preparation. Pharma labeling sits at the intersection of regulation, materials science and patient safety, and increasingly, sustainability. It’s a space where small decisions carry significant consequences.

Here, he shares his perspective on where pharma labeling is heading, and what it actually takes to move it forward.

Expert in focus: Adam Borkowski on turning a lifelong passion for cars into real-world impact

Why pharma sustainability isn’t as limited as it seems

When people think about label sustainability, pharma is usually the last sector that comes to mind. And I understand why. It's heavily regulated, change is slow and the stakes around patient safety mean that every material decision carries real weight. Early in my role, I assumed that meant our options were genuinely limited.

What surprised me was the opposite. Speaking with suppliers, converters and pharmaceutical companies, I found a real diversity of approaches and a lot of creativity in how people are thinking about reducing the environmental footprint of packaging without compromising what matters most. The sector is constrained, yes. But those constraints are also driving more inventive ways of thinking about the problem.

 

Sustainability is a series of decisions, not a single switch

The industry is approaching sustainability across the full lifecycle of a label — from how much material goes into it, to what happens when the packaging is discarded. The first instinct many companies have is to focus on material reduction: moving to thinner facestocks and rethinking liner construction. That's a meaningful starting point and the shift is already visible in how converters specify materials.

But material weight is only one dimension. Recycled content is gaining ground. We're running pilot projects with customers using certified recycled PP and chemically recycled PET in pharmaceutical applications. There's also growing interest in monomaterial constructions that support recyclability at end of life, and in adhesive systems that release cleanly from packaging during the recycling process rather than contaminating the stream. Another shift underway is moving, where possible, from solvent-based adhesives to emulsion-based systems, supporting more sustainable processing without changing performance expectations.

And through it all, the baseline requirement doesn't change. Before we introduced rPET liners with 30% recycled content into our pharmaceutical portfolio, we ran full extractables testing with an accredited third-party laboratory — GLP/GMP certified, EN ISO 17025 accredited, FDA registered — following USP 1663 protocols. That's the level of validation the industry requires, and it should be. Sustainable progress that creates patient risk isn't progress.

What's shifting is that companies are starting to see this validation work as a competitive differentiator rather than a barrier. The ones moving fastest are those who started testing earliest.

Expert in focus: Adam Borkowski on turning a lifelong passion for cars into real-world impact

Regulation is complex, but it’s forcing clarity

The Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) is reshaping how the whole packaging sector thinks about materials, and pharmaceutical packaging is no exception. But the regulation is causing significant confusion across the value chain and the most common question I hear is a fundamental one: is pharma packaging exempt?

The answer isn't straightforward. For example, specific derogations from the Design for Recycling (DfR) requirements exist for the immediate packaging of medicinal products until 2035 and for the recycled content targets regarding contact-sensitive plastic packaging of medical devices. But not every pharmaceutical package qualifies for such exemptions. If the outer packaging isn't required to preserve product quality, the DfR and recycled content requirements apply.

Take a nasal spray sold in a cardboard box. The HDPE spray itself appears to meet the criteria for a derogation. The cardboard box is unlikely to qualify for an exemption from the DfR requirements since it is not necessary to preserve the quality of the product. However, it is exempted from the recycled content targets since those currently focus on plastic components. That's a small distinction with significant commercial implications — and it's the kind of detail that gets missed when companies assume a blanket exemption.

PPWR is pushing the industry toward decisions it might otherwise have deferred. In that sense, the regulatory pressure and the sustainability agenda are pointing in the same direction, which is useful, even if navigating the details is genuinely complex.

 

The digital layer could reshape everything

When I think about what will genuinely change pharmaceutical packaging in the next three to five years, I keep coming back to the same answer: not a new material, but a new layer of intelligence. RFID and NFC are moving from pilot to mainstream and the implications go well beyond track-and-trace.

On the manufacturing side, RFID helps tackle what I’d describe as a hidden waste problem. 2022 research suggests that around 4% of pharmaceutical production is currently lost to batch mix-ups, expired product and resource misallocation. Real-time tracking can significantly reduce that waste while improving efficiency across the process.

At end of life, NFC opens up different possibilities. With packaging like autoinjectors, where emissions are heavily driven by raw materials and disposal, NFC can support electronic product information, authentication, adherence tracking and recycling guidance without changing the physical container itself.

The challenge is making these solutions work consistently across packaging lines, markets and regulatory frameworks. That’s where testing and collaboration across the value chain become essential. What’s becoming clearer is that sustainability and patient safety are starting to align. Less waste, greater traceability and smarter end-of-life systems all contribute to more reliable pharmaceutical packaging.



Get in touch

If you would like to learn more about our automotive labeling portfolio, please do not hesitate to contact our team. We serve this industry every day and are happy to assist you in solving your challenges. Click here to contact us today and let's take the first step towards overcoming your labeling obstacles together.