How will the PPWR affect extended producer responsibility schemes

How will the PPWR affect extended producer responsibility schemes?


On average, each European citizen generates almost 190 kg of packaging waste per year. This amount is expected to reach 209 kg in 2030 unless additional measures are taken. One step the EU is taking to address waste management is making Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes for packaging mandatory across all EU member states by the end of 2024.
 

How will the PPWR affect extended producer responsibility schemes

 

The upcoming Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) intends to harmonize Design for Recycling (DfR) criteria and introduce a framework for modulating EPR fees – also known as eco-modulation – according to recyclability performance grades A, B or C by January 2028. This measure will further motivate sustainable packaging design as packaging with higher recyclability performance grades will benefit from lower fees. 

We know how important it is to choose the right labeling solutions, as your label choice can have a significant impact on the fees that must be paid under EPR schemes. This article will give you an overview of these schemes now and in the future, and what this will mean for your business.

 

How will the PPWR affect extended producer responsibility schemes

EPR schemes: now and in the future 

An EPR scheme requires producers to finance and organize the management of the packaging waste they generate by paying EPR fees. The goal is to incentivize producers – manufactures, importers or distributors – to consider the environmental impacts of their products throughout the entire product lifecycle, including collection, sorting, and recycling, leading to increased recycling rates, less waste and reduced pollution.

EPR schemes for packaging in Europe aren’t new. Germany was the first country in the EU to set up an EPR scheme for packaging in 1991. In 2018, an amendment to the former Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive (PPWD) was issued, with the goal of ensuring all Member States have these schemes fully operational and harmonized by the end of 2024.

Under PPWR, EPR fees will be eco-modulated based on the packaging recyclability performance grade. Member States can choose to modulate EPR fees based on additional criteria, such as recycled content. The collected fees are then used to finance the collection, sorting, and recycling of these packaging materials at the end of their life, provide for data collection, and invest in public recycling awareness campaigns.

 

How will the PPWR affect extended producer responsibility schemes

 

Eco-modulation was designed to encourage producers to consider the overall environmental impact of their products. It incentivizes the development and design of more sustainable packaging solutions that are easier to recycle, more durable and less harmful to the environment. While some EU countries already have eco-modulated fees incorporated into their EPR schemes, they vary significantly between countries, leaving producers to navigate the complex EPR landscape. 

 

Complexity of EPR fees across Europe 

The fee structure can vary depending on the packaging category and the specific EPR scheme in each country in which goods are sold. The number of EPR organizations can vary per country, and from one organization to another, resulting in a complex challenge for producers to calculate what fees they are required to pay. 

For example, in the Netherlands, Verpact manages the packaging waste EPR scheme. Producers pay a fee per package, which is then used to finance the collection and recycling of packaging waste across the country. Verpact provides the information and tools to producers that help them assess how their packaging choices comply with EPR criteria. They also suggest how sustainable products, such as sustainable labels, can help lower fees and provide reporting to the government on the progress they are making in reaching recycling targets. 

More recently in 2024, Verpact introduced an eco-modulation model for the calculation of EPR fees for plastic packaging. This model rewards highly recyclable packaging (ie: packaging that consists of a mono-material, features transparent, white or natural colors and/ or features labels that comply with the proposed criteria and that passes KIDV’s Recycle checks for rigid or flexible packaging) and the use of recycled content. For example, rigid plastics such as PET bottles or HDPE containers, that have a regular tariff of 1.22 €/kg, can have up to 50 cents discount, leading to a reduced tariff of 0.72 €/kg.

 

How the PPWR will impact brands, converters and existing EPR fees

The PPWR is poised to significantly transform the packaging landscape, with far-reaching implications for both brands and converters. The shift towards increased producer responsibility, stricter design requirements and a greater emphasis on eco-modulation will necessitate a fundamental rethinking of packaging strategies.

 

How will the PPWR affect extended producer responsibility schemes

 

For brands, this means a greater focus on sustainable packaging design and material choices. Converters will need to adapt their offerings to align with these new demands, ensuring labels are recyclable and meet circular design standards.

Embracing these sustainable design principles, following recycling guidelines, and fostering collaboration across the value chain are proactive steps your business can take to comply with regulations and thrive in the evolving packaging landscape.


Learn more    

Read our article about how you can prepare for the upcoming changes in EPR schemes or visit our PPWR page for more information on the legislation and its requirements.